Isopp 2023

The proceedings contain 109 papers. The topics discussed include: dose intensity of palbociclib and initial body weight dosage: implications on progression free survival in 220 patients with ER+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer;characteristics of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (Paxlovid) recipients and clinical interventions by oncology pharmacists at a tertiary outpatient cancer center;safe handling of non-carcinogenic drugs in the Ghent University Hospital: development, implementation and communication of hospital-specific guidelines;case series: use of olaparib in uncommon locations in patients with impaired homologous recombination;real-world data evaluation of medicines used in special situations in oncohematology: a retrospective study from a comprehensive cancer institution;Dostarlimab in the treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer: real life experience;medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws and CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer;and efficacy and safety outcomes of generic imatinib in adults with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) following the switch from branded imatinib.

The Impact of the Sars-Cov-2 Pandemic (COVID-19) on the Incidence of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Using a Federated Network of Real-World Evidence in US and Germany

Objectives: COVID-19 had an impact on health care, including diagnostics. Early diagnosis of MM is a critical factor for prognosis. We examined the impact of COVID-19 on incidence of NDMM patients and on characteristics in NDMM patients in US and in Germany. Method(s): 44,164 NDMM patients were identified in TriNetX federated network across 55 healthcare organizations in US between January 2018 and December 2021. A bivariate analysis examined changes in patient characteristics in two cohorts before (Cohort 1;n=25513) and after (Cohort 2;n=18.651) the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. 4172 NDMM patients were identified in the German database in a sample of across >100 healthcare organizations in the same time period. Similarly, bivariate analysis examined changes in patient characteristics before (Cohort 1;n=2252) and after (Cohort 2;n=1920) the start of pandemic. Result(s): Analysis of US data showed a significant decrease in incidence of NDMM. Bivariate analysis revealed that NDMM patients in Cohort 2 have a significantly higher risk profile compared with patients in Cohort 1, higher incidence of renal failure (13.5% v. 15.43%), heart failure (10.3% v 11.26%), bone lesions (12.6% v. 13.05%) and anemia (26.8% v. 29.75%). The German data indicated an increased risk profile in Cohort 2, with higher reporting of renal impairment (12.3% v. 15.5%) and cardiac impairment (8.3% v. 10.9%). The higher risk profile was reflected in a significant increase of all SLiM-CRAB criteria, notably hypercalcemia (24.1 % v. 36.9%), bone marrow plasma cell infiltration (28.1% v. 36.8%) and free light chain involvement (27.3% v. 41.3%). Conclusion(s): The results provide real-world evidence of a change in risk profile for patients with NDMM during COVID-19. This higher risk profile is observed in both the US and Germany, and may negatively impact outcomes such as progression-free and five-year overall survival.Copyright © 2023

Association of state-level COVID-19 mortality rates with real-world progression and real-world overall survival among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, 2020-2022

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the delivery of cancer care and outcomes in the United States (US). We examined the association between time-varying state-level weekly COVID19 mortality and progression-free survival (rwPFS), time to progression (rwTTP), and survival (rwOS) among pts with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (advNSCLC). Method(s): This retrospective study used the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health recordderived de-identified database. The cohort included community oncology pts diagnosed with advNSCLC between March 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021 (follow-up through March 30, 2022). We extracted US data on COVID-19 deaths from the COVID-19 Data Repository by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering at Johns Hopkins University. We calculated state-level weekly COVID-19 death rates as weekly COVID-19 deaths per state population size from the 2019 American Community Survey. We categorized rates into quintiles based on all weekly rates during the observation period. Analyses were restricted to treated pts and indexed to start of first-line therapy. For rwPFS analyses, first occurrence of progression or death was considered an event, and pts were censored at last clinic note date. For rwTTP, only progression (not death) was considered an event, and pts with no event were censored at last clinic note date. For rwOS analyses, pts who did not die were censored at last structured activity. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between weekly time-varying state-level COVID-19 mortality rates and outcomes of rwPFS, rwTTP, and rwOS, adjusted for age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, and state. Result(s): Among 7,813 advNSCLC pts, the median age at diagnosis was 70 years, the majority of the cohort was non-Hispanic White (59%), had non-squamous cell histology (68%) and a history of smoking (87%). Compared to pts living in states with the lowest quintile of COVID-19 mortality rates (Q1), pts living in states with the highest COVID-19 mortality (Q5) had worse rwOS (Q5 vs. Q1: HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.26-1.69) and rwPFS (Q5 vs. Q1: HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05-1.33). No association was observed with rwTTP (Q5 vs. Q1: HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.90-1.22). Conclusion(s): In this study of real-world oncology data, we demonstrated the use of publicly-available COVID-19 mortality data to measure the time-varying impact of COVID-19 severity on outcomes in pts with advNSCLC. Higher state-level COVID-19 mortality rates were associated with worse rwOS and rwPFS among advNSCLC pts. The association with increased mortality among pts with advNSCLC may be related to COVID-19-related mortality or other factors such as pre-existing comorbidities which were not explored in this study.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Zanubrutinib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL): Final Analysis of the Magnolia (BGB-3111-214) Trial

Introduction: Advanced MZL is generally incurable, with periods of remission and relapse. Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111), a potent and highly specific next-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, was approved in the US and Canada for R/R MZL based on the MAGNOLIA primary analysis (BGB- 3111-214;NCT03846427);here, the final MAGNOLIA analysis is presented. Method(s): This was a phase 2, multicenter, single-arm study of adult patients (pts) with R/R MZL (>=1 prior CD20-directed therapy). Zanubrutinib (160 mg twice daily) was given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC) per Lugano classification. Secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed ORR, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Efficacy was assessed by positron emission tomography (PET)-based Lugano criteria for IRC-confirmed fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease at baseline;non-avid disease was assessed by computed tomography (CT)-based criteria. Result(s): As of May 4, 2022, 68 pts were treated (median age=70 y [range 37-95];>=75 y=27.9%). MZL subtypes included extranodal (38.2%), nodal (38.2%), splenic (17.6%), and unknown (5.9%). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-6);32.4% of pts had disease refractory to last therapy, most (89.7%) had prior chemoimmunotherapy, and 7 (10.3%) had rituximab monotherapy as their only prior treatment. Sixty-one pts (89.7%) had FDG-avid disease. After a median follow-up of 28.0 mos (range 1.6-32.9) and a median treatment duration of 24.2 mos (range 0.9-32.9), 66 pts were efficacy- evaluable. IRC-assessed ORR (complete response [CR]+partial response [PR]) was 68.2% (CR=25.8%). By subtype, (Figure Presented)(Figure Presented)ORR/CR rates were 64.0%/40.0% (extranodal), 76.0%/20.0% (nodal), 66.7%/8.3% (splenic), and 50.0%/25.0% (unknown). Median DOR, PFS, and OS were not reached. Over 70.0% of pts were alive or progression-free after 2 years (Figure). Sensitivity analysis using only CT-based criteria (n=66) showed an ORR of 66.7% and CR of 24.2%. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were bruising (23.5%), diarrhea (22.1%), and constipation (17.6%). Neutropenia (8.8%) and COVID-19 pneumonia (5.9%) were the most common Grade >=3 AEs. Five pts (7.4%) died due to unrelated AEs: COVID-19 pneumonia=2, acute myeloid leukemia=1, myocardial infarction=1, septic encephalopathy=1. Hypertension occurred in 3 pts (4.4%), atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in 1 pt (1.5%) each;none led to treatment withdrawal. One pt (1.5%) had a Grade 3 gastrointestinal hemorrhage while receiving rivaroxaban. None of the pts required dose reduction. Conclusion(s): In this final analysis with over 2 years of median follow-up, zanubrutinib continues to demonstrate durable disease control and was generally well tolerated, with no new safety signals observedCopyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Prophylactic Corticosteroid Use with Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel) in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed/ Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma (R/R LBCL): 2-Year Follow-up of Zuma-1 Cohort 6

Background: The ZUMA-1 safety management Cohort 6 (N=40), which evaluated whether prophylactic corticosteroids and earlier corticosteroids and/or tocilizumab could improve safety outcomes, demonstrated an improved safety profile (no Grade >=3 cytokine release syndrome [CRS];15% Grade >=3 neurologic events [NEs]) vs pivotal Cohorts 1+2, without compromising response rate or durability (95% ORR, 80% CR rate, and 53% ongoing response rate with >=1 y of follow-up;Oluwole, et al. ASH 2021. 2832). Here, 2-y updated outcomes are reported. Method(s): Eligible pts with R/R LBCL underwent leukapheresis (followed by optional bridging therapy) and conditioning chemotherapy, then a single axi-cel infusion. Pts received corticosteroid prophylaxis (once-daily oral dexamethasone 10 mg on Days 0 [before axi-cel], 1, and 2) and earlier corticosteroids and/or tocilizumab for CRS and NE management vs Cohorts 1+2 (Oluwole, et al. Br J Haematol. 2021). The primary endpoints were incidence and severity of CRS and NEs. Secondary endpoints included ORR (investigator-assessed), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell levels in blood. Result(s): As of December 16, 2021, the median follow-up time for the 40 treated pts was 26.9 mo. Since the 1-y analysis, no new CRS events were reported (no pts had Grade >=3 CRS to date). The incidence of Grade >=3 NEs increased from 15% to 18%between the 1-y and 2-y analyses. Two new NEs occurred in 2 pts: 1 pt had Grade 2 dementia (onset on Day 685 and ongoing at time of data cutoff;not related to axi-cel) and 1 had Grade 5 axi-cel-related leukoencephalopathy. Since the 1-y analysis, 6 new infections were reported (Grades 1, 2, and 5 COVID-19 [n=1 each], Grade 3 Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia [n=1], Grade 3 unknown infectious episode with inflammatory syndrome [n=1], and Grade 2 herpes zoster [n=1]). In total, 8 deaths occurred since the 1-y analysis (progressive disease [n=5], leukoencephalopathy [n=1], and COVID-19 [n=2]). The ORR was 95% (80% CR), which was unchanged from the 1-y analysis. Median DOR and PFS were since reached (25.9 mo [95% CI, 7.8-not estimable] and 26.8 mo [95% CI, 8.7-not estimable], respectively). Median OS was still not reached. Kaplan- Meier estimates of the 2-y DOR, PFS, and OS rates were 53%, 53%, and 62%, respectively. Of 18 pts (45%) in ongoing response at data cutoff, all achieved CR as the best response. By Month 24, 14/20 pts with evaluable samples (70%) had detectable CAR T cells (vs 23/36 pts [64%] in Cohorts 1+2). Conclusion(s): With 2 y of follow-up, the ZUMA-1 Cohort 6 toxicity management strategy continued to demonstrate an improved long-term safety profile of axi-cel in pts with R/R LBCL. Further, responses remained high, durable, and similar to those observed in Cohorts 1+2 (Locke, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019).Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

EMERALD trial analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with ER+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer (mBC) comparing oral elacestrant vs standard of care (SoC) endocrine therapy

Background: The phase III EMERALD trial (NCT03778931) reported significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and a manageable safety profile with elacestrant vs SoC endocrine therapy (ET) in patients (N=478) with ER+/HER2- advanced or mBC following progression on prior CDK4/6i plus ET. PROs measuring quality of life (QoL) are reported here. Method(s): EMERALD patients (pts) completed 3 PRO tools at prespecified time points: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), the PRO version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), and the EuroQoL 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L). Result(s): The ratio of PROs tools completed vs. PROs tools expected was 80-90% through cycle 4 and approximately 70% at cycle 6;likely due to clinical study period overlapping with COVID-19 period. Overall, the EORTC QLQ-C30 scores were similar for elacestrant and SoC, with no differences across all time points for both functional and symptom scales. However, PRO-CTCAE results showed that fewer pts who received elacestrant reported very severe nausea (4.0% vs 14.3% by cycle 6) or very severe vomiting (9.1% vs 50% by cycle 6) compared with SoC. There were no clinically meaningful differences across all time points in adverse events typically observed with pts with cancer on ET, such as fatigue, nausea, vomiting, joint and muscle pain and hot flashes. EQ-5D-5L scores were generally comparable throughout treatment for both study arms, with elacestrant showing numerically better outcomes vs SoC for mobility, self-care and usual activities. Similar trends were observed for the full intent-to-treat population and in pts with detectable estrogen receptor 1 mutations (ESR1m). Conclusion(s): This analysis confirmed that QoL was maintained between treatment groups in the EMERALD trial. Together with the previously described statistically significant prolonged PFS and manageable safety profile, these PRO results provide additional evidence that oral elacestrant is clinically meaningful in this patient population with limited therapeutic options. Clinical trial identification: NCT03778931. Editorial acknowledgement: Jeffrey Walter, IQVIA. Legal entity responsible for the study: Stemline Therapeutics/Menarini Group. Funding(s): Stemline Therapeutics/Menarini Group. Disclosure: J. Cortes: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, Celgene, Cellestia, AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Erytech, Athenex, Polyphor, Lilly, MERCK SHARP& DOHME, GSK, LEUKO, Bioasis, Clovis oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ellipses, Hibercell, BioInvent, Gemoab, Gilead, Menarini, Zymeworks, Reveal Genomics;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, Novartis, Celgene, Eisai, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Lilly, MERCK SHARP& DOHME, Daiichi Sankyo;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting/advisor: Expres2ion Biotechnologies;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: MedSIR, Nektar Therapeutics;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche, Ariad Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Baxalta GMBH/Servier Affaires, Bayer healthcare, Eisai, Guardant Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Piqur Therapeutics, Puma B, Queen Mary University of London;Other, Travel cost and expenses: Roche, Novartis, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Gilead, AstraZeneca. F.C. Bidard: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Novartis, Radius Health, Menarini;Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Role: Menarini;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Roche, Lilly, Rain Therapeutics;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis, Pfizer, Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Prolynx;Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, patents: ESR1 & MSI detection techniques;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novartis. A. Bardia: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer, Novartis, Genentech, Merck, Sanofi, Eisa , Lilly, Mersana, AstraZeneca/Daiichi, Menarini, Gilead;Financial Interests, Personal, Royalties: UpToDate;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Sanofi, Radius Health, Immunomedics/Gilead, Daiichi Pharma/AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly.;Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: Gilead, Mersana, AstraZeneca/Daiichi, Novartis, Pfizer, Genentech, Lilly, Merck, Sanofi. V.G. Kaklamani: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, Genomic Health, Puma Biotechnology, AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics, Daichi, Gilead Sciences;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Amgen, Eisai, Puma Biotechnology, Celldex, AstraZeneca, Athenex, bioTheranostics;Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker's Bureau: Genentech, Novartis, Genomic Health, Puma Biotechnology, Pfizer, AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Eisai. I. Vlachaki: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Menarini Hellas A.E. G. Tonini: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Menarini Ricerche S.p.A. N. Habboubi: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Stemline Therapeutics;Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Stemline Therapeutics. P.G. Aftimos: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Boehringer Ingelheim, Macrogenics, Roche, Novartis, Amcure, Servier, G1 Therapeutics, Radius, Deloitte, Menarini, Gilead, Novartis, Eisai, Lilly;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Synthon, Amgen;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche.Copyright © 2023

Tumor agnostic comparison of immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing in detecting ALK fusions and assessment of ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor efficacy

Background: Reliable methods to identify anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions are critical to matching patients to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) therapy, on or off trial. Various methods including FISH have been used, but immunohistochemistry (IHC) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) are most commonly employed. Evaluating the concordance of IHC and NGS is key, particularly in non-lung cancers where data is sparse. Method(s): NGS+ (MSK-IMPACT DNA hybrid capture NGS and/or RNA anchored multiplex PCR) and/or IHC+ (clone: D5F3) patients with cancers of any histology were identified as ALK+. ALK IHC was scored as negative (0), equivocal (e: 1+, 2+) or positive (3). Concordance of ALK detection (number of NGS+ and IHC+/total number of patients with NGS and IHC) was calculated. For patients with metastatic disease treated with any ALK TKI in the first-line (1L) setting, progression-free survival (PFS) was reported. Result(s): 347 ALK+ solid tumor patients were identified. As expected, the majority (96%, n=336) had lung cancer, however, 11 patients with 11 unique non-lung cancer histologies were found (3 gastrointestinal, 2 gynecologic, 1 breast, 1 thyroid, 1 primary brain tumor, 1 DLBCL, 1 PEComa, and 1 CUP). 57% had EML4-ALK fusions;36 non-EML4 ALK rearrangements were identified, including four novel fusions (PEKHA7-ALK, ZFPM2-ALK, TRIM24-ALK, ALK-MYO3B). ALK was evaluated by IHC alone in 83 patients (23.9%). The concordance rate between NGS and IHC was 85%. Among discordant cases, 11% (n=28) were IHC+/NGS-, 24% (n=63) were IHCe/NGS-, 3% (n=8) were IHCe/NGS+, and 0.4% (n=1) was IHC-/NGS+. The most frequent ALK TKIs were alectinib (n= 87, 58%) and crizotinib (n= 56, 38%). PFS on 1L ALK TKIs for patients with IHC+/NGS+ (n=134), IHC-/NGS+(n=1), IHC+/NGS- (n=8), IHCe/NGS+ (n=4), IHCe/NGS- (n=1) was 26 months, 26 months, 39 months, 41 months, 9 months respectively. Conclusion(s): In a population including multiple tumor types, NGS and IHC were highly concordant in ALK fusion detection. ALK TKI benefit may be observed in cases with discordant testing, in which only one assay detects a putative ALK fusion. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding(s): NIH Cancer Center grant: P30CA008748. Disclosure: M.G. Kris: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Boehringer Ingelheim, National Lung Cancer Partnership, Pfizer, PUMA, Stand up to Cancer;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Ariad, AstraZeneca, Bind Bioscience, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chug Pharma, Clovis, Covidien, Daiichi Sankyo, Esanex, Genentech;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Millenium, Pfizer, Roche. A. Drilon: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Ignyta/Genentech/Roche, Loxo/Bayer/Lilly, Takeda/Ariad/Millennium, TP Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Blueprint Medicines, Helsinn, BeiGene, BerGenBio, Hengrui Therapeutics, Exelixis, Tyra Biosciences, Verastem Oncology, MORE Health, AbbVie, 14ner/Elevation Oncology, Remedica Ltd, ArcherDX, Monopteros, Novartis, EMD Serono, Melendi, Liberum, Repare RX, Amgen, Janssen, EcoR1, Monte Rosa;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, CME: Medscape, Onclive, PeerVoice, Physicians Education Resources, Targeted Oncology, Research to Practice, PeerView Institute, Paradigm Medical Communications, WebMD, MJH Life Sciences, Med Learning, Imedex, Answers in CME, Medscape, Clinical Care Options, AiCME;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, CME, Consulting: Axis;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting: Nuvalent, Merus, EPG Health, mBrace, Harborside Nexus, Ology, TouchIME, Entos, Treeline Bio, Prelude, Applied Pharmaceutical Science, Inc;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Chugai Pharmaceutical, Remedica Ltd, RV More;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Treeline Biosciences;Financial Interests, Personal, Royalties: Wolters Kluwer;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, stocks: mBrace;Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, Research funding: Pfizer, Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKline, Teva, Taiho, PharmaMar;Finan ial Interests, Personal, Funding, Research: Foundation Medicine;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member: ASCO, AACR, IASLC;Other, Personal, Other, Food/Beverage: Merck, PUMA, Merus;Other, Personal, Other, Other: Boehringer Ingelheim. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.Copyright © 2023 European Society for Medical Oncology

Clinical Outcomes of Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Radical Radiotherapy in a Institution in Brazil

Introduction: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death. Most cases are diagnosed at advanced stages. Stage III cancers are treated in a curative manner, despite the low success rate. Our objective was to define the clinical and epidemiological profile of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts) treated with radiotherapy (RT) and their response to therapy. Method(s): It is a retrospective and observational study of all non-surgical stage III NSCLC pts treated with RT with curative intent at a public cancer center in the south of Brazil between January/2016 and June/2022. Data collected: dates of biopsy, treatment initiation, image progression or relapse, death and last registration;ECOG-PS;sex;smoking status;histology;stage (TNM 7th Ed) and chemotherapy (CT) use. Survival analysis were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and factors associated with the events were analyzed using Cox regression. Groups were compared with chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Result(s): Eighty-seven pts were identified;median age 63 years-old;46 (52%) male, 78 (90%) former or present smokers;51 (62%) ECOG-PS 0/1;49 (58%) squamous (sq) histology;48 (60%) stage IIIb;60 (68%) had abdomen, bone and brain scans;64 (73%) had concurrent CT, 11(13%) sequential and 12 (14%) exclusive RT;64 (74%) concluded RT;53 (60%) had disease progression or relapse and 47 (54%) died. It took a median of 77 days (d) from biopsy to treatment initiation, without difference between pre or during COVID-19 pandemic. The follow-up was of 305d, progression free survival 192d and overall survival 253d (median for all), using the treatment initiation as baseline date. Younger pts and ECOG-PS 0/1 pts were more commonly treated with concurrent CT (X2:8,87;p 0,0054 and X2:10,82;p 0,004 respectively). No factor influenced progression free survival on uni or multivariable analyses. Factors correlated with overall survival on univariable analysis were: ECOG-PS (hazard ratio (HR) 2,02;p 0,010);bone scan (HR 0,5;p 0,028);treatment conclusion (HR 3,53;p<0,0001). Multivariable analysis: ECOG-PS (HR 2,95;p 0,017), non-sq histology (HR 2,26;p 0,044);RT conclusion (HR 4,69;p<0,0001). Conclusion(s): Our study shows shorter overall and progression free survival than literature, with a large portion of patients being treated with ECOG-PS of 2 or greater and without adequate systemic staging. About one-quarter of patients did not conclude the treatment, and this was the most negative factor impacting survival next to ECOG-PS.Copyright © 2023

COVID-19 infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Objective. To assess the course and outcomes of COVID-19 in recipients of allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Materials and methods. The retrospective study included 44 adult recipients (allogeneic - 33 [75%] and autologous - 11 [25%] of HSCT who diagnosed with COVID-19 after transplantation. Group mostly represented by acute leukemia - 18 (41%) and lymphoma - 10 (22.7%). The median follow-up time since the development of COVID-19 was 231 days (1-818 days), after HSCT - 507.5 days (14-3723 days). Overall and progression-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier and Log-Rank method. We also evaluated the characteristics of the course of a new coronavirus infection. Results. Median time for the development of COVID-19 from the moment of HSCT was 122.5 days (-1-3490 days). Twelve patients (27.2%) were in grade 3-4 neutropenia at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, 16 (36.4%) patients were in grade 1-2 neutropenia. Sixteen (48.4%) allo-HSCT recipients had active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at the time of COVID-19 development. Disease severity was mild in 19 (43.2%) and moderate in 13 (29.5%) patients. Overall, 200-day survival from the onset of COVID-19 was 78.8% (95% CI [63.1-88.4]). Anemia (p = 0.02) and thrombocytopenia (p = 0.01) significantly decrease OS in patients with COVID-19 after HSCT. Patients with GVHD at the time of COVID-19 onset had a better survival rate (p = 0.02). The timing of COVID-19 development after HSCT did not affect outcomes. Conclusions. The key points of the course of COVID-19 in HSCT recipients are the presence of cytopenia and graft-versus-host disease. Overall survival was 78.8%.Copyright © 2022, Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Final results of a phase 1b/2 study of tivozanib in combination with durvalumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in both previously untreated patients and patients progressing on atezolizumab and bevacizumab

Background: The approval of atezolizumab + bevacizumab for untreated advanced HCC was a significant benefit for patients, but with an increased risk of potentially severe bleeding complications. Tivozanib (a selective VEGFR 1, 2, & 3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]) has been combined with durvalumab in the DEDUCTIVE study;preliminary results presented in January 2022 showed that this combination was well tolerated with comparable efficacy to other immune checkpoint and VEGF containing regimens in patients with previously untreated HCC (J Clin Oncol 40, no. 4 suppl 462-462). We now report the final results of this cohort (cohort A) of patients as well as those with previously treated HCC, including safety results for all the patients. Method(s): Major eligibility criteria included age .18 yrs with documented advanced HCC, Child-Pugh Class A, ECOG 0 or 1, and creatinine clearance .40 ml/min. Major exclusion criteria included co-infection with HBV and HCV and significant organ dysfunction. Patients were treated with 0.89 mg tivozanib p.o., 21 days on followed by 7 days off and 1500 mg durvalumab i.v. every 28 days. The primary objective was to determine the safety and tolerability of this combination in patients with advanced HCC;secondary objectives included assessing objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival, and overall survival (OS). The study was amended in 2021 to include a cohort of patients previously treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (cohort B). Result(s): 21 patients were enrolled in cohort A and 6 in cohort B;the median age was 67, 88% of patients were male, and 24% were Asian. The median followup time was 13.2 mos and 3.4 mos for cohorts A and B, respectively. Data were available for 25 of the 27 patients enrolled. For cohort A, the ORR was 25% (5/20) and 1-year OS was 76%. For safety analysis, 24 (96%) patients had at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE);92% were attributed possibly to either tivozanib or durvalumab;32% were serious TEAEs and there was 1 TEAE leading to death (unrelated). Of the 8 (32%) serious TEAE, 2 were coronavirus infection. 2 patients had serious (grade 3) treatment-related AEs: 1 pneumonitis and 1 with gastrointestinal hemorrhage and anemia. There were no grade 4 or 5 treatment-related AEs. Conclusion(s): Treatment with the combination of tivozanib and durvalumab in patients with either untreated advanced HCC or those previously treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab was well tolerated;no severe bleeding events occurred in this study. Efficacy outcomes were comparable to other IO-TKI combinations in HCC. Data for PDL1 status, HBV/HCV status was collected and will be presented along with final safety and efficacy results for both cohorts.

Intravesical administration of durvalumab to patients with high risk non muscle invasive bladder cancer after BCG failure. A phase II trial by the Hellenic GU Cancer Group

Introduction & Objectives: Patients with high risk non muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who experience BCG failure have limited bladder preserving treatment options as radical cystectomy currently represents the standard therapeutical approach. Systematic immunotherapy (IO) has changed the landscape in advanced bladder cancer and is currently being investigated in NMIBC. Based on the hypothesis that intravesical administration will not be related with severe adverse events, we evaluated the role of intravesically administered durvalumab in NMIBC patients after BCG failure. Material(s) and Method(s): An open label, single-arm, multi-center, phase II clinical trial was conducted. A run-in phase had the objective to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of durvalumab and to exclude a detrimental effect on disease relapse by this strategy. Durvalumab was administered for a total of 6 instillations per patient at consecutive levels of 500, 750 and 1000 mg. Phase II has as primary end point the 1-year high-grade-relapse-free (HGRF)-rate. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, and high-grade progression-free rat at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment. Result(s): Thirty patients were enrolled (run in phase: 9, phase II: 21). One patient withdrew consent prior to receiving study treatment, so 29 patients were included in efficacy and toxicity analyses. Mean age was 66.5 years. MTD of durvalumab was set at 1000 mg as no dose related toxicities (DLTs) occurred at any level studied. Three of 9 patients included in the run-in phase (33.3%) were tumor free one month after the last durvalumab instillation, therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected by the futility analysis. Western blot showed that durvalumab remained stable in urine during instillation. One patient died from Covid-19, 3 months after the last durvalumab administration. All patients concluded at least 1 year follow up. One-year HGRF rate was 34.6%. HGRF rates at 1, 3 and 6 months was 73%, 65.3% and 50% respectively. Five patients (17%) experienced a T2 or above disease relapse. Five out of the six patients who received 500mg or 750mg of durvalumab relapsed within 1 year. When efficacy analyses were restricted to patients receiving 1000mg of durvalumab, 1-year HGRF rate was 35%. Interestingly, 2 out of 2 patients with only CIS disease at baseline experienced a tumor complete response, which was durable and was maintained at least for a year. No severe adverse events were noted. The most common adverse event was Grade 1 hematuria. Conclusion(s): Intravesical IO using durvalumab was proved to be feasible with an excellent safety profile. Oncological results seem to be promising and comparable with other bladder preserving strategies in BCG failure with the advantage of a better safety profile. Further study of intravesical IO in high-risk patients with NMIBC after BCG failure is warranted.Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Treatment of HER2-positive (HER2+) hormonereceptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with the novel combination of zanidatamab, palbociclib, and fulvestrant

Background: HER2+ mBC remains incurable, with a need for new HER2-directed therapies and regimens, including chemotherapy-free options. Zanidatamab (zani) is a novel HER2-targeted bispecific antibody that binds HER2 in a unique trans configuration, driving multiple mechanisms of antitumor activity, including complement-dependent cytotoxicity. A CDK4/6 inhibitor combined with endocrine therapy is an approved treatment for HER2-negative/HR+ mBC and this combination has also demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity when paired with HER2-targeted therapy(ies) in HER2+/HR+ mBC. Here, we report results from ZWI-ZW25-202 (NCT04224272), an ongoing singlearm phase 2 study of zani combined with palbociclib (palbo) and fulvestrant (fulv) in pts with HER2+/HR+ mBC. Method(s): Eligibility requirements include: HER2+/HR+ unresectable, locally advanced BC or mBC;ECOG PS of 0 or 1;prior treatment with trastuzumab, pertuzumab and T DM1 (additional prior HER2-targeting agents are permitted);and no prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Part 1 of the study evaluated the safety and tolerability of the zani/palbo/fulv combination and determined the recommended doses for use in Part 2, where the antitumor activity of the combination is being evaluated. Endpoints include safety outcomes, progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6), confirmed objective response rate (cORR) per RECIST v1.1;disease control rate (DCR=complete response [CR] plus partial response [PR] plus stable disease [SD]);duration of response (DOR);PFS;and overall survival. Result(s): As of 24 Feb 2022, 34 pts (33 HER2+/HR+ per central analysis) with a median age of 52 (range 36-77) have been treated. In the metastatic setting, pts had received a median (range) of 4 (1-10) prior systemic regimens, including 3 (1-8) different prior HER2 targeted therapies, and 1 (0-4) endocrine therapy. Seven pts (20%) had prior T DXd treatment and 7 pts had prior fulv treatment. All pts received zani (20 mg/kg Q2W) and standard doses of palbo and fulv. Eighteen pts (53%) remained on treatment;median duration of zani treatment was 6.9 mo (range 0.5- 16.3). A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of neutropenia occurred in 1 of 7 DLT-evaluable pts in Part 1. Among all pts (n=34), the most common (>20%) treatment (zani, palbo and/or fulv)-related adverse events (TRAEs) were diarrhea (74%), neutrophil count decreased/neutropenia (62%), stomatitis (41%), asthenia (26%), nausea (24%), and anemia (21%). Grade (Gr) >=3 TRAEs in 2 or more pts included neutrophil count decreased/neutropenia (50%), anemia (6%), diarrhea (6%), and thrombocytopenia (6%). AEs of special interest were all Gr <=2 and included 4 pts with cardiac events (LVEF decrease of >=10% from baseline) and 1 pt with infusion-related reaction. There were no treatment-related serious AEs. Palbo was discontinued for 1 pt due to an AE (AST increase);no pt discontinued zani treatment as a result of AEs. Two deaths occurred: 1 due to disease progression and 1 due to an unrelated AE of pneumonia caused by COVID-19. In 29 pts with measurable disease, the cORR was 34.5% (95% CI: 17.9, 54.3), all responses were cPRs, of which 1 is pending CR confirmation. DOR ranged from 2.3 to 14.9+ mo, with 8 confirmed responses ongoing, and the DCR was 93.1% (95% CI: 77.2, 99.2). Interim median PFS was 11.3 mo (range 0.03-16.7;95% CI: 5.6, not estimable). PFS6 analysis is planned following the completion of enrollment. Conclusion(s): Zani in combination with palbo and fulv shows encouraging antitumor activity with durable responses in heavily pretreated pts and a manageable safety profile. This regimen has the potential to be a chemotherapy-free treatment option in pts with HER2+/HR+ mBC. Enrollment in the study is continuing.

A novel indicator QD reveals the response evaluation regularity of liver cancer patients in the COVID-19 era

Aims: The COVID-19 epidemic has disrupted the daily life of all people, especially cancer patients. In clinical practice, the evaluation cycle of patients is not regular, which impacts subsequent treatment and tumor monitoring to some extent. The objective of this study was to compare the characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with liver lesions based on the regularity of response evaluation (RE). Method(s): Data on patients with tumor lesions in the liver between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021, were extract from the Clinical Research Intelligence System of Shanghai General Hospital. The quartile deviation (QD) of patient evaluation intervals was introduced as an indicator to determine the regularity of their voluntary RE. The characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients from the start of treatment were evaluated and compared. Result(s): A total of 587 records from 102 patients were screened and analyzed, and two-thirds of the patients (60.784%) had more than 7 REs during the treatment period. The average QD value of all patients was 6.77, which was used to divide patients into a regular RE group and an irregular RE group. The regular group were younger (61.6 +/-1.218) and had shorter RE intervals (10.57 +/-0.4566) and better OS (mOS = 39 months). Conclusion(s): The QD of patient evaluation intervals is a reasonable indicator of RE regularity, and the regular administration of response evaluations in cancer patients is an important factor affecting survival outcomes.

Role of plasma fibrinogen and D-dimer as prognostic biomarkers in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Background: We aimed to evaluate the role of plasma fibrinogen and D-dimer as prognostic biomarkers in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Method(s): The prospective study included 35 patients (30 males) with newly diagnosed NMIBC with no history of thromboembolic event or anti-coagulant intake or active infection and underwent complete trans-urethral resection between September 2020 and December 2021. Patients with deranged hepato-renal functions, refractory hypertension or diagnosed with COVID-19 infection with in one-month before surgery or routine follow-up were excluded. Follow-up was done as per NCCN guidelines. Fibrinogen and D-dimer levels were measured with in seven days of surgery or follow-up and analyzed for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cox regression analyses were adopted to assess the influence of these two parameters on RFS and PFS. Result(s): The mean age was 53.9 years with a median follow-up of 9-months. Nine had recurrence of which six had progression. The cut-off values of fibrinogen and D-dimer were 402.5 mg/dl and 0.55 microg/ml, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that high fibrinogen and D-dimer levels were significantly related to poor RFS and PFS (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis only fibrinogen and D-dimer retained their significance for RFS (p = 0.026 and 0.014, respectively) and PFS (p = 0.027 and 0.042, respectively). High levels of fibrinogen and D-dimer were also present in patients who had recurrence or progression at follow-up visits compared to rest of the patients. Conclusion(s): High levels of fibrinogen and D-dimer may indicate worse prognosis in patients with NMIBC, suggesting that these two can be used as prognostic biomarkers.Copyright © 2023, The Author(s).

Hydroxychloroquine: New Perspectives for an Indispensable Old Drug

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a multi-functional drug owing to its lysosomotropic, immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, anti-infective, antithrombotic, antitumoral (pronounced effects on autophagy and apoptosis processes) and beneficial metabolic properties (improved lipid profiles, decreased insulin resistance). We know that chronic low-dose HCQ therapy has been successfully used in a variety of chronic diseases such as rheumatological and dermatological disorders. Additionally, with all these effects mentioned above and showing synergism, HCQ can also be useful mostly as an adjuvant in the management of many chronic metabolic disorders, serious life-threatening conditions such as cardiovascular, neurological, oncological and infectious diseases, as well as their accompanying morbidities. More recently, this former drug, whose effectiveness has been shown in the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, has entered the spotlight again. Ongoing clinical trials testing HCQ in new indications and challenging diseases are still receiving great attention. In this article, the mechanisms of action, current clinical uses and new indications of HCQ therapy have been overviewed with a comprehensive literature review.Copyright © Necati Ozpinar. All rights reserved.

Indian Multicenter Phase Ii Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Post Stem Cell Maintenance Regimen for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (Impose Bortecon Study)

Introduction: Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains the backbone therapeutic modality with the highest progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit even in the era of the novel agents in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The survival post-transplant can be prolonged using maintenance therapies. The regimen with maximum benefit is still debated, with bortezomib showing PFS benefit even in the high-risk myeloma. Aims & Objectives: This randomized phase II trial is aimed at studying the efficacy (as measured by overall survival (OS), progression- free survival (PFS)), and safety of post-ASCT different maintenance regimens in patients with NDMM. Material(s) and Method(s): Multicentric open-label interventional study with randomized allocation, parallel assignment, with intention-totreat analysis. Recruitment was prospective starting 01 Jan 2017, including all NDMM patients eligible for the study. Remission status was evaluated at D100 and every 6 months for 2y post-ASCT, including MRD analysis by multicolor flow cytometry (MFC) and PET/CT. The four arms included (Arm-A) bortezomib alone (V), (Arm-B) bortezomib in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD), (Arm-C) bortezomib in combination with lenalidomide (VR), and (Arm-D) Lenalidomide starting D100 till 2y post-ASCT. Adverse events with CTACE grade<2 were defined as non-serious and the rest as serious. JMP ver. 13 was used for statistical analysis and p<0.05 was considered significant. Kaplan Meier statistics was used for survival analysis. Result(s): A total of 123 patients have enrolled of which 92 patients completed the study protocol and the rest 31 patients were excluded because of protocol deviation due to the COVID pandemic. The median age of the study population was 54.5y (35-76y) with a male preponderance (67%). There was no statistically significant difference between the four arms on the log-rank test in the OS (p-0.99), clinical PFS (p-0.65), biochemical PFS (p-0.6), or MFC-based PFS (p-0.83). There was a statistically significant difference between the four arms on the log-rank test (p-0.0185) on PET/CT-based PFS (PFS being in a descending order VCD>V>VR>R regimen). The all-cause mortality of the study participants was 19.57% (n-18) and the difference in deaths among the various groups was not statistically significant (p-0.85). The tolerability, serious and non-serious adverse were significantly higher amongst Arm D patients. Conclusion(s): We conclude that there was no difference in OS between the different regimens. Patients on Lenalidomide-only therapy had significantly inferior Imaging-PFS.

A Modified Regimen of 21-day Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Real-World Study.

BACKGROUND: It is 1 of the standard treatment options for metastasis pancreatic cancer to receive nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days. Some patients showed intolerance and inconvenience to this therapeutic regimen. Thus, we conducted this retrospective real-world study to determine the efficacy and tolerability of a modified 21-day nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P/Gem) regimen for the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 every 21-day at West China Hospital and Shang Jin Hospital of Sichuan University from Mar 2018 to Dec 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical characteristics of patients were collected. The progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, and toxicity were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients who received the modified regimen of 21-day nab-P/Gem chemotherapy were included. The median overall survival was 9.3 months and the median progression-free survival was 4.4 months. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 18.6% and 56.7%, respectively. The median relative dose intensity for this modified regimen was 65%. The adverse events were mild to moderate, and the most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (21%) and leukopenia (16%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that this modified regimen of 21-day nab-P/Gem for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer had comparable efficacy and tolerable toxicity. This treatment may provide a considerable option for pancreatic cancer patients who desire a modified schedule. The modified regimen of 21-day nab-P/Gem is also an option worth considering during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic for minimizing the number of visits and limiting the risk of exposure.

CARTITUDE-2 Cohort A: Updated Clinical Data and Biological Correlative Analyses of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel (cilta-cel) in Lenalidomide-Refractory Patients With Progressive Multiple Myeloma (MM) After 1-3 Prior Lines of Therapy (LOT)

Context: CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) Cohort A is assessing cilta-cel in lenalidomide-refractory patients with progressive MM after 1-3 prior LOT. Objective(s): To present updated results from CARTITUDE-2 Cohort A. Design(s): Phase 2, multicohort study. Patient(s): Lenalidomide-refractory patients with progressive MM after 1-3 prior LOT (PI and IMiD included) and no previous exposure to BCMA-targeting agents. Intervention(s): Single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0.75x106 CAR+ viable T-cells/kg) after lymphodepletion Main Outcome Measure(s): Primary endpoint was minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at 10-5. Management strategies were used to reduce risk of movement/neurocognitive adverse events (MNTs). Pharmacokinetics (PK) (Cmax/Tmax of CAR+T-cell transgene levels), cytokine release syndrome (CRS)-related cytokines over time, peak cytokine levels by response/CRS, association of cytokine levels with immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and CAR+T-cell CD4/CD8 ratio by response/CRS/ICANS are being evaluated. Result(s): As of January 2022 (median follow-up [MFU] 17.1 months), 20 patients (65% male;median age 60 years;median 2 prior LOT;95% refractory to last LOT) received cilta-cel. Overall response rate was 95% (90% >=complete response;95% >=very good partial response). Median times to first and best response were 1.0 month and 2.6 months, respectively. All 16 MRD-evaluable patients achieved MRD negativity at 10-5. Median duration of response was not reached. At 12 months, event-free rate was 79% and progression-free survival rate was 75%. 95% of patients had CRS (gr3/4 10%);median time to onset was 7 days and median duration was 3 days. Neurotoxicity was reported in 30% of patients (5 gr1/2;1 gr3/4) and ICANS in 15% (all 3 gr1/2);1 patient had gr2 facial paralysis. No MNTs were observed. 1 death occurred due to COVID-19 (treatment-related), 2 due to progressive disease, and 1 due to sepsis (not treatment-related). Preliminary PK analyses showed peak CAR-T cell expansion at day 10.5;median persistence was 153.5 days. Conclusion(s): At MFU of 17.1 months, a single cilta-cel infusion resulted in deep and durable responses in lenalidomide-refractory MM patients with 1-3 prior LOT. We will present updated PK/cytokine/CAR-T subset analyses and clinical correlation to provide novel insights into biological correlates of efficacy/safety in this population. Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc.